YUQI / INFORMATION SYSTEMS Enterprise IT planning and consulting · illustrative scenarios

Make IT From drawings · Carry through to the job site Make systems trulyrunup and running

Yuqi Intelligent focuses onCoordinated on-site deliveryandEnterprise IT planning and consulting, map the six dimensions of business processes, organizational collaboration, applications, data, infrastructure and operations to createPhased deliveryBuild a roadmap that makes every investmentPriority · dependencies · governanceclear.

  • 01Business processes
  • 02Organizational collaboration
  • 03Applications
  • 04Data
  • 05Infrastructure
  • 06Operational capability
DEMO P1 · Process assessment / in progress (demonstration)
SCROLL
// 00

Present on site, at the job site and in the server room

From shop floor to server room, from meeting room to job site — we advise and deliver.

0
Enterprise IT planning and consulting project (illustrative metrics)
2018–2026 · across 9 industries
0
Enterprise core-system implementation (illustrative metrics)
MES · ERP · BI · IoT · …
0
Critical-system availability (illustrative metric)
Monitoring definitions · service hours as agreed in the contract
0
The six-dimension assessment covers
Business processes → operational capability

Counts, scores, availability, investment, value and schedules on this page are layout illustrations, not Yuqi project results, monitoring data or contractual commitments.

// 01

IT is not Adopt the system
Instead, align six dimensions

IT initiatives often fail not because of technology, but because six dimensions are not aligned in one plan.
We have seen too many “We bought a system, but can't get people to use it.” projects — at root, they lack one unified roadmap.

  1. P-01

    Process bottlenecks

    Business workflows have not been mapped end to end, systems are disconnected, and documented processes do not match system workflows.

  2. P-02

    Inefficient collaboration

    Responsibilities are unclear; cross-functional projects lack owners, requirements keep changing and progress is hard to track.

  3. P-03

    System silos

    Multiple systems coexist with different data formats and costly custom development, slowing the launch of new business.

  4. P-04

    Dormant data

    Collecting data without definitions, governance or decision support is almost the same as having none.

  5. P-05

    Fragmented infrastructure

    Server rooms, networks and endpoints are from different generations, with no unified plan for availability, security or scalability.

  6. P-06

    Unstructured operations

    Problems rely on manual watching, changes are improvised, and there are no SLAs, observability or incident playbooks.

Site 01Disorganized rack cabling · no labels or inventory
Site 02Shop-floor equipment is offline · data is copied by hand
Site 03Siloed job-site monitoring · no coordination
Site 04Construction and system delivery are out of sync · repeated rework
// 02

Six-dimension assessment:Start with the whole picture
Then decide where to begin

Score six dimensions together: business processes, organizational collaboration, applications, data, infrastructure and operations.
Map the client's IT maturity on a radar chart and use it as the starting point for every subsequent roadmap.

Business processes Organizational collaboration Applications Data Infrastructure Operational capability 6D · ASSESS
FIG · six-dimension maturity radar · maximum score 5.0
FIG · maturity trend Illustrative trend
M0M1M2M3M4M5 · NOW
FIG · six-dimension scores Illustrative score · maximum 5.0
  • 01Business processes3.7
  • 02Organizational collaboration3.2
  • 03Applications2.8
  • 04Data2.5
  • 05Infrastructure3.5
  • 06Operational capability2.6
01

Business processes

3.7

Map workflows from order to payment, assess process maturity, locate bottlenecks and redesign processes.

02

Organizational collaboration

3.2

Responsibility matrix · RACI · PMO design · cross-functional owners · communication cadence and escalation path.

03

Applications

2.8

Core-system selection · assessment of existing systems · integration architecture · API and shared-platform strategy.

04

Data

2.5

Master data · metadata · data governance · metrics · BI · a data-driven decision loop.

05

Infrastructure

3.5

Server rooms · networks · compute · storage · security · disaster recovery · coordinated with on-site low-voltage and smart systems.

06

Operational capability

2.6

Build SLA, observability, change management, incident response and 7×24 operating capabilities.

Rack aisle · illustrative scene
0 days

Safe-work process · illustrative scenario

Pre-shift meetings · weekly inspections · monthly exercises — procedures and records are defined per project.

Cable management · labels · inventory

Illustrative feedback: The plan must work on site, with clear coordination boundaries for job sites, server rooms and meeting rooms.

Illustrative feedback tone · not a client quotation · illustrative feedback tone · not a client quotation
// 03

Six-dimension architecture:From the bottom up
From the job site to decision-making

We structure enterprise IT across five layers and one cross-cutting thread, each independently assessed, delivered and accepted;
But they must passGovernance and operationsBring this cross-cutting thread together in one plan.

CROSS · governance and operations span every layer
L5 · Business processes Strategy → processes → systems → data → feedback loop
L4 · Organizational collaboration PMO · RACI · process owners · communications · escalation path
L3 · Applications ERP · MES · PLM · WMS · SRM · custom systems
L2 · Data Master data · metadata · metrics · BI · data governance
L1 · Infrastructure Server rooms · networks · compute · storage · security · disaster recovery
  • PMO
  • Observability · logs / traces
  • Change · incident response · exercises
  • Consulting · implementation · operations
  • SLA · as agreed in the contract
  • ISO 27001 · confirm per project
  • MLPS 2.0 · confirm per project
  • Three committees and one executive layer · governance
FIG · five-layer architecture + cross-cutting governance and operations
P-A

Acceptable by layer

Each layer has independently verifiable deliverables, avoiding work that is “finished but impossible to verify.”

P-B

Evolvable

Each layer can be replaced or upgraded, allowing new business to connect smoothly to the existing architecture.

P-C

Observable

From user experience to system logs, each layer has SLAs and monitoring so delivery can be measured.

The 99.95 figure is illustrative. Availability targets, monitoring definitions and SLAs are assessed per project and agreed in the contract.

P-D

Governable

Change, access, audit and compliance — governance spans all five layers, with no more than three decision levels.

// RUNTIME · Five-layer end-to-end flow CROSS · governance and operations · data flows up · control flows down
// 04

Five-stage roadmap:Phased delivery
Each phase has deliverables

Without phased delivery, IT becomes a one-off purchase. We break the overall roadmap into 5 stages, each phase has its own investment, deliverables and acceptance criteria;
The next stage does not begin until the previous one passes review.

  1. P1
    P1 · 0–8 weeks

    Process assessment and six-dimension baseline

    • Six-dimension maturity radar
    • End-to-end process mapping
    • Organizational collaboration baseline
    • Gap register · GAP
    ¥80,000–150,000 · medium risk
  2. P2
    P2 · 2–4 months

    Data and application foundation

    • Master data governance plan
    • Metrics framework · 1.0
    • Core-system selection and PoC
    • Integration architecture blueprint
    ¥600,000–1.2 million · medium risk
  3. P3
    P3 · 4–9 months

    Core-system implementation

    • ERP / MES pilot go-live
    • BI and decision dashboards
    • Access and change management
    • Training and certified staffing
    ¥1.5–4 million · high risk
  4. P4
    P4 · 9–14 months

    Infrastructure and security

    • Server-room and network upgrades
    • Disaster recovery and backup
    • MLPS 2.0 / ISO 27001
    • Low-voltage coordination at the construction site
    ¥2–6 million · medium risk
  5. P5
    P5 · Ongoing

    Operations and continuous improvement

    • Service hours and SLAs are set by contract
    • Observability · exercises
    • Monthly value review
    • Rolling roadmap updates
    Annual subscription · lower risk
// 05

Priority · dependencies · investment · governance
Four things inOne matrixUp

IT projects without governance are likely to lose control. We use a prioritization matrix to place work into four quadrants,
Coordination Three committees and one executive layer governance structure, making every investment traceable, reviewable and accountable.

URGENT · NOT IMPORTANT URGENT · IMPORTANT NOT URGENT · NOT IMPORTANT NOT URGENT · IMPORTANT A1 A2 B1 B2 C1 C2 D1
FIG · prioritization matrix · horizontal = importance · vertical = urgency
FIG · risk levelsReal time · 12 risk categories
LowMediumHigh
FIG · decision feedback loopM1 → M2 → M3 → M4
FIG · investment / valueCumulative, P1 to P5
Investment ¥ 8.6 M
Value ¥ 21.4 M
ROI 2.49×

Three committees and one executive layer · Governance structure

  1. M1
    Steering committeeMonthly· Strategy · budget · major changes
  2. M2
    Project Management Office (PMO)Weekly· Schedule · risks · resources
  3. M3
    Technical review meetingEvery two weeks· Selection · integration · security
  4. M4
    Execution layer · owners from each business functionDaily· Delivery · feedback · exceptions

5 investment conditions · Every element is essential

  1. 01
    Executive-sponsored initiative · The client's top executive chairs the steering committee
  2. 02
    Process owner model · Assign exactly one owner to each core process
  3. 03
    Recognize data assets in the accounts · Govern data as a measurable asset
  4. 04
    Ongoing budget · Budget for operations as well as implementation
  5. 05
    On-site delivery capability · Coordinate low-voltage, server-room, smart-building and system delivery
// 06

22 deliverables
Every item has acceptance criteria

The biggest risk in IT delivery is finishing work that cannot be verified. We break every deliverable down toVerifiable at acceptanceat a level of detail that —
22 deliverables across five stages: consulting, systems, data, infrastructure and operations.

  1. D-01

    Six-dimension maturity assessment report

    Consulting
  2. D-02

    End-to-end process mapping and gap register

    Consulting
  3. D-03

    Organizational RACI and PMO charter

    Consulting
  4. D-04

    Enterprise IT roadmap · 5 stages

    Consulting
  5. D-05

    Master data governance plan · MDG

    Data
  6. D-06

    Metrics framework and decision dashboard 1.0

    Data
  7. D-07

    Data-asset registration and lineage

    Data
  8. D-08

    Core business-system selection and PoC

    Applications
  9. D-09

    ERP / MES / WMS go-live

    Applications
  10. D-10

    API integration and shared service platform

    Applications
  11. D-11

    Server-room planning and construction · modular design

    Foundation
  12. D-12

    Networks and security · zero trust

    Foundation
  13. D-13

    Disaster recovery and backup plan

    Foundation
  14. D-14

    Low-voltage and smart systems at the construction site

    Foundation
  15. D-15

    MLPS 2.0 / ISO 27001

    Safety
  16. D-16

    Observability · logs / traces / metrics

    Operations
  17. D-17

    SLA and change-management process

    Operations
  18. D-18

    Incident-response playbooks and exercises

    Operations
  19. D-19

    Training · certification · knowledge base

    Enablement
  20. D-20

    Monthly value review · MBR

    Governance
  21. D-21

    Quarterly roadmap updates

    Governance
  22. D-22

    7×24 operations and continuous improvement

    Operations
D-04Roadmap · illustrative drawing-review scene
D-16Observability · monitoring dashboard
// 07

What matters to the client:Three items
Items that can be verified (illustrative)

The question is not “how much work did we do?” butWhat the client needs to verify. The following three examples illustrate how delivery can be verified. All figures are demonstrative and are not Yuqi results or SLA commitments.

37%

Cross-functional collaboration cycle (illustrative)

Illustrative: track collaboration cycles through a PMO and process-owner model; verify actual results against project data.

99.95%

Critical-system availability (illustrative)

Illustrative: record system availability using defined monitoring and service hours; targets, response and SLAs are subject to contract.

2.6×

Data-driven decision efficiency (illustrative)

Illustrative: assess decision efficiency using master-data governance, metrics and BI dashboards; verify actual results per project.

The feedback below is illustrative page copy, not a client quotation or proof of results.

“Yuqi helped move our IT program from ‘a system no one uses’ to ‘workflows that run and data people can use.’”
The hardest part is not the technology. Illustrative feedback: “The plan must work on site, with clear coordination boundaries for job sites, server rooms and meeting rooms.”

CIO feedback tone (illustrative)Not a client quotation · not proof of results
// 08

Consulting + implementation + operations
Coordinated deliverycore capabilities

Most consultancies understand consulting; most contractors understand construction.
Yuqi brings both types of work into one delivery chain — Validate consulting recommendations against site conditions。

C1

Consulting

Six-dimension assessment · roadmap · governance · technology selection — translating business challenges into technical decisions.

C2

System integration

ERP · MES · WMS · BI · custom systems — selection, customization, integration and go-live.

C3

Data governance

Master data · metadata · metrics · data lineage — making data useful for decisions.

C4

Infrastructure

Server rooms · networks · security · disaster recovery — modular, scalable and supportable.

C5

On-site construction

Low-voltage · smart systems · structured cabling — coordinate site delivery with the systems rollout.

C6

Operations and optimization

7×24 support · SLA · incident response · exercises · value reviews — helping delivered systems continue to create value.

// 09

Coordinated on-site delivery:Plans that can be put into practice
Ready to deliver on site

This is Yuqi's intended delivery approach — not just a report, but a plan aligned with site conditions on one schedule.
Coordinated consulting, implementation and operations, with crews and subcontracting boundaries for low-voltage, smart systems, server rooms and cabling defined per project.

Crew, personnel, project and safe-day counts are layout placeholders and must be verified against authorized records, project documents and contract scope.

0 support

Construction crew (illustrative)

Low-voltage · smart systems · server rooms · structured cabling; crews and subcontracting boundaries are set per project.

0 People

Site engineer (illustrative)

Electrician certification · work-at-height certification · safety officer certificate · PMP · system integration project management certification.

0 items

Factory / job-site scenario (illustrative)

Scenario coverage and project counts must be verified against authorized records and project evidence.

0 days

Accident-free operations

Illustrative values · safety records, responsibility boundaries and exercise frequency are set per project.

// 10

Business scenario:Illustrations from eight industry types
One methodology, applied to different needs

The following industry scenarios and delivery structures are illustrative, not authorized client case studies.
Every scenario has its ownSpecific needs, with the underlying method adjusted to site assessments, project scope and contractual terms.

Discrete manufacturing

End-to-end digitalization from order to delivery

Integrate MES, ERP and WMS; connect shop-floor dashboards and equipment, trace quality, and support intelligent production scheduling.

Chemicals / process industries

Safe production + energy optimization + incident response

Process-data collection · hazard monitoring · energy BI · emergency command — coordinated with process construction.

Construction / job site

Smart systems and project management at the construction site

Smart job site · worker location · video monitoring · schedule coordination — deliver low-voltage systems and software together.

Campus / city

Smart campuses and city operations

Unified campus map · connected equipment · integrated security · emergency dispatch — cross-system integration.

Finance / telecommunications

High-availability architecture and regulatory compliance

Active-active data center · MLPS / ISO 27001 · business continuity management (illustrative compliance objectives; confirm per project).

Public services

One-stop government services and data sharing

Government service platform · data exchange · cross-agency collaboration · one-window service — delivered alongside on-site implementation capabilities.

Ports / logistics

Multimodal transport and warehouse coordination

Yard dispatch · gate recognition · integrated WMS/TMS · digitized cross-border documents — coordinated with on-site low-voltage work.

City / operations

Urban lifelines and emergency coordination

Utility monitoring · traffic-signal optimization · connected video · unified emergency command — 7×24 operations.

// 11

ThreeCase-study structureIllustration

The three IT scenarios below are structural illustrations of acceptance and verification criteria. They are not publicly disclosed Yuqi client cases and do not imply that site visits are available.
Delivery must be verified against project records, site conditions and contractual terms.

  1. CASE · 01

    Discrete-manufacturing scenario (illustrative)

    Illustrative structure: phased roadmap, MES/ERP/WMS/BI integration and investment boundaries; assess and contract the actual schedule, systems and budget per project.

    • Discrete manufacturing
    • Five stages
    • Budget as contracted
  2. CASE · 02

    Process-industry scenario (illustrative)

    Illustrative structure: coordination between process-data collection, emergency command and a security baseline; assess factory count, delivery scope and compliance level per project and contract.

    • Process industries
    • Illustrative compliance objective
    • Scope set per project
  3. CASE · 03

    Healthcare IT scenario (illustrative)

    Illustrative structure: healthcare-system integration, data governance and remote collaboration; confirm facility count, system scope and compliance requirements per project.

    • Healthcare
    • Interoperability
    • Scope set per project
// 13

Book a session 90 minutes Assessment

No slide deck or formal project proposal is needed.
Tell us your challenges and current state; in 90 minutes, we will provide aSix-dimension assessment + roadmap recommendations。

// This page does not store form submissions; use the website contact page.